All the news today about Stephen King has been about the making of one of his earlier novels called "It" directed by Cary Fukunaga. The thing is, they are planning to split the movie into two parts. I am sitting here wondering if this is a good idea or not.
On the one hand there are enough Stephen King Fans out there, the movie will probably make enough money to make both movies. I know I am one of those people who will go out and pay the ridiculous amounts of money to see the films. I just hope they don't make it in 3D.
The story is long enough they will be able to fit it into two movies. I just wonder if it is necessary. Stephen King has problems with Movies and TV because he treats it like a novel. I spends so much time on the world and character building that he loses the short attention spans of people who would rather watch the film instead of reading a book-stop of a novel.
On the other hand I am not sure the story can be successfully split into two. There are so many things going on in this story. I guess they could split it into time periods. The first movie would be about the group as kids and how they all left town. Then the second movie could be about them coming back together as adults to face the one thing that changed their lives forever.
Needless to say, this is going to be a fun couple of films based on one of King's Masterpieces. It is going to be fun, scary and will remind us why we all hate clowns.